Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Communications Commission v. Wjr, The Goodwill Station, Inc. Et Al.

• 1948 • 337 U.S. 265 • Vinson Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, The Goodwill Station, Inc., et al., in 1948 revolved around the allocation of radio frequencies by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC had reassigned certain frequencies to balance out clear and local channels across different regions. This reassignment led to a reduction in coverage for some stations including WJR, which filed a lawsuit against the FCC claiming that it exceeded its authority under the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1948
Docket: 495
337 U.S. 265
69 S. Ct. 1097
93 L. Ed. 2d 1353
1949 U.S. LEXIS 2953
Argued: Apr 22, 1949

Federal Communications Commission v. Wjr, The Goodwill Station, Inc. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, The Goodwill Station, Inc., et al., in 1948 revolved around the allocation of radio frequencies by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC had reassigned certain frequencies to balance out clear and local channels across different regions. This reassignment led to a reduction in coverage for some stations including WJR, which filed a lawsuit against the FCC claiming that it exceeded its authority under the Communications Act of 1934. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of FCC stating that it was within their power to make such changes as they were aimed at public convenience or interest. Furthermore, while acknowledging potential losses for individual broadcasters due to these changes; it emphasized on prioritizing overall public interest over private interests.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, The Goodwill Station, Inc., et al., argued that the majority's decision to uphold the FCC's order was an overreach of power and violated principles of administrative law. They contended that while Congress had given the FCC authority to regulate radio frequencies, it did not grant them unlimited discretion to do so without any standards or guidelines. In this particular case, they believed that there were no clear reasons for why certain stations were granted more favorable treatment than others by being allowed higher power levels and better frequency assignments. This lack of transparency raised concerns about arbitrary action on part of the agency which could potentially infrive upon broadcasters' rights under due process clause as well as free speech protections guaranteed by First Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice WBRutledge
Decided: Jun 06, 1949
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms