Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co. Et Al.

• 1978 • 439 U.S. 508 • Burger Court
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co., et al., 1978, is a case that centered on the issue of whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC), now known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), had jurisdiction over sales of natural gas made directly to industrial consumers by independent producers who were not engaged in interstate commerce. The FPC asserted its authority under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act which gave it control over...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1978
Docket: 77-648
439 U.S. 508
99 S. Ct. 765
58 L. Ed. 2d 773
1979 U.S. LEXIS 24
Argued: Nov 28, 1978

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co., et al., 1978, is a case that centered on the issue of whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC), now known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), had jurisdiction over sales of natural gas made directly to industrial consumers by independent producers who were not engaged in interstate commerce. The FPC asserted its authority under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act which gave it control over transportation and sale for resale in interstate commerce but did not explicitly mention direct sales. Pennzoil argued against this interpretation, asserting that such transactions fell outside federal purview because they didn't involve interstate transport or resale. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of FERC's broader interpretation, stating that Congress intended to give comprehensive authority to regulate all aspects of natural gas affecting interstate commerce when it enacted the Natural Gas Act.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co., it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold FERC's jurisdiction over intrastate natural gas producers under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) was incorrect. The dissenters believed that Congress did not intend for FERC to have such broad regulatory power, and instead intended state authorities to regulate these producers. They pointed out that NGPA’s language does not explicitly grant this authority to FERC, and thus its interpretation by the majority is an unwarranted expansion of federal power into areas traditionally controlled by states. Furthermore, they contended that if Congress had wanted FERC to oversee intrastate production, it would have clearly stated so in NGPA itself rather than leaving it up for judicial interpretation.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jan 16, 1979
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms