Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

First National Bank Of Bay City v. Fellows, Attorney General Of The State Of Michigan, On The Relation Of Union Trust Company Et Al.

• 1916 • 244 U.S. 416 • White Court
In the case of First National Bank of Bay City v. Fellows, Attorney General of Michigan, on behalf of Union Trust Company et al., 1916, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state law could impose an inheritance tax on money deposited in a bank by a non-resident decedent at the time of their death. The court held that such taxation was not permissible under federal law as it violated due process rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief White Court
Term: 1916
Docket: 764
244 U.S. 416
37 S. Ct. 734
61 L. Ed. 1233
1917 U.S. LEXIS 1654
Argued: Mar 22, 1917

First National Bank Of Bay City v. Fellows, Attorney General Of The State Of Michigan, On The Relation Of Union Trust Company Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of First National Bank of Bay City v. Fellows, Attorney General of Michigan, on behalf of Union Trust Company et al., 1916, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state law could impose an inheritance tax on money deposited in a bank by a non-resident decedent at the time of their death. The court held that such taxation was not permissible under federal law as it violated due process rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This decision established that states cannot levy taxes on property located outside their jurisdiction and reaffirmed principles regarding interstate commerce and constitutional limitations on state power over such matters.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for First National Bank of Bay City v. Fellows, it was argued that Michigan's law requiring out-of-state banks to pay a franchise tax should not be considered unconstitutional. The justice disagreed with the majority's view that this law violated the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving these banks of their property without due process of law. He contended that states have a right to impose taxes on businesses operating within their borders and believed there was no discrimination against out-of-state entities as all corporations were subject to similar taxation under state laws. Furthermore, he asserted that such regulations are necessary for maintaining control over foreign corporations doing business in the state and ensuring they contribute fairly towards public expenses.

Opinion written by Justice EDEWhite
Decided: Jun 11, 1917
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms