Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Fok Yung Yo v. United States

• 1901 • 185 U.S. 296 • Fuller Court
In the 1901 case of Fok Yung Yo v. United States, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning immigration law and its application to Chinese immigrants. The petitioner, Fok Yung Yo, was denied entry into the United States based on an interpretation of Section Six of the Act which Congress passed in 1884 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese individuals. This section required that Chinese laborers who left America had to obtain certificates before they could return;...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1901
Docket: 478
185 U.S. 296
22 S. Ct. 686
46 L. Ed. 917
1902 U.S. LEXIS 2195
Argued: Jan 07, 1902

Fok Yung Yo v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1901 case of Fok Yung Yo v. United States, the U.S Supreme Court ruled on a matter concerning immigration law and its application to Chinese immigrants. The petitioner, Fok Yung Yo, was denied entry into the United States based on an interpretation of Section Six of the Act which Congress passed in 1884 to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese individuals. This section required that Chinese laborers who left America had to obtain certificates before they could return; however, it did not apply this requirement for merchants or their children born abroad. Fok Yung Yo argued that he should be allowed entry as his father was a merchant residing in San Francisco at his birth time overseas and thus exempt from these restrictions. The court rejected this argument stating that while indeed there were exceptions for merchants' children born abroad if they were minors accompanying their parents back into America or those who came with parental permission after reaching majority age (21 years), these exemptions didn't extend automatically beyond adulthood without explicit parental consent given when still under legal age limit.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for FOK YUNG YO v. UNITED STATES, it was argued that the majority's decision to deny Yo's entry into the United States based on his inability to provide a certificate of residence was unjust. The dissenting justices believed that this requirement violated Yo's rights under international law and treaties between China and the U.S., which guaranteed free movement for Chinese laborers who were already residing in America before November 17, 1880. They contended that these agreements did not stipulate any conditions or limitations regarding their re-entry after visiting China, nor did they require them to carry certificates of residence as proof of their status. Therefore, according to this view, denying Yo’s admission solely due to lack of such documentation contradicted these treaty obligations and constituted an unlawful act by immigration authorities.

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: May 05, 1902
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms