Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Forest Grove School District v. T. A.

• 2008 • 557 U.S. 230 • Roberts Court
In the case of Forest Grove School District v. T.A., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of parents who unilaterally placed their child in private school due to a public school's failure to provide appropriate special education services, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The student, identified only as T.A., was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder but his Oregon-based public school district failed to recognize him as eligible for special...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Roberts Court
Term: 2008
Docket: 08-305
557 U.S. 230
129 S. Ct. 2484
174 L. Ed. 2d 168
2009 U.S. LEXIS 4645
Argued: Apr 28, 2009

Forest Grove School District v. T. A.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Questions presented:
SCOTUS Records

08-305 FOREST GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT V. T.A. DECISION BELOW: 523 F.3d 1078 EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE. CERT. GRANTED 1/16/2009 QUESTION PRESENTED: This case presents the question on which the Court granted certiorari, but was unable to resolve, in Board of Education v. Tom F. ex rel. Gilbert F., 128 S. Ct. 1 (2007) (per curiam): Whether the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act permits a tuition reimbursement award against a school district and in favor of parents who unilaterally place their child in private school, where the child had not previously received special education and related services under the authority of a public agency. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 05-35641

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Forest Grove School District v. T.A., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of parents who unilaterally placed their child in private school due to a public school's failure to provide appropriate special education services, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The student, identified only as T.A., was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder but his Oregon-based public school district failed to recognize him as eligible for special education services. His parents subsequently enrolled him in a private residential program and sought tuition reimbursement from the district under IDEA. Initially, lower courts denied this claim citing an amendment that limited reimbursements if a child had not previously received special education from a public institution. However, on appeal, it was determined that such limitation did not apply when schools fail their responsibility under IDEA; hence they could be held financially responsible even if students hadn't been receiving specialized instruction or related aid priorly.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Forest Grove School District v. T.A., Justice David Souter, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, argued that the majority's interpretation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was incorrect. They contended that IDEA does not require public schools to reimburse parents who unilaterally place their children in private schools without first receiving special education services from a public school. The dissenters believed this interpretation contradicted Congress' intent when it amended IDEA in 1997 to limit such reimbursement only to students who had previously received special education services through a public agency. They also expressed concern about potential financial burdens on school districts resulting from increased litigation and reimbursement costs if parents could bypass working collaboratively with public schools before seeking private alternatives.

Opinion written by Justice JPStevens
Decided: Jun 22, 2009
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms