Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Fox, Tax Commissioner Of West Virginia, v. Gulf Refining Co.

• 1934 • 295 U.S. 75 • Hughes Court
In the case of Fox, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia v. Gulf Refining Co., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gulf Refining Company, stating that West Virginia's tax on gasoline was unconstitutional as it violated the Commerce Clause. The state had imposed a tax on all gasoline sold within its borders, including fuel transported and sold by companies from other states like Gulf Refining Co. The court held that this taxation interfered with interstate commerce because it placed an undue...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 70
295 U.S. 75
55 S. Ct. 641
79 L. Ed. 1311
1935 U.S. LEXIS 306

Fox, Tax Commissioner Of West Virginia, v. Gulf Refining Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Fox, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia v. Gulf Refining Co., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gulf Refining Company, stating that West Virginia's tax on gasoline was unconstitutional as it violated the Commerce Clause. The state had imposed a tax on all gasoline sold within its borders, including fuel transported and sold by companies from other states like Gulf Refining Co. The court held that this taxation interfered with interstate commerce because it placed an undue burden on out-of-state businesses compared to those operating solely within West Virginia. This decision reinforced the principle that states cannot pass legislation which discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of Fox, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia v. Gulf Refining Co., Justice Stone argued that the tax imposed by West Virginia on gasoline stored within its borders but destined for sale in other states was not an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce. He contended that since all property within a state's jurisdiction is subject to taxation and this includes goods intended for exportation, it should also apply to those intended for interstate commerce. The justice further stated that such taxes do not discriminate against or directly regulate interstate commerce as they are levied upon storage which is a local activity and thus under state control. Therefore, he disagreed with the majority's ruling striking down the tax.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Apr 08, 1935
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms