Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp. Et Al.

• 1975 • 426 U.S. 271 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp et al., 1975, revolved around the issue of whether or not a municipal corporation that generates and sells electric power both for its own use and to other consumers could be classified as a "public utility" under Part II of the Federal Power Act (FPA). The court ruled in favor of Conway Corporation, stating that it was not subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission (now known as the Federal Energy Regulatory...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 75-342
426 U.S. 271
96 S. Ct. 1999
48 L. Ed. 2d 626
1976 U.S. LEXIS 129
Argued: Apr 21, 1976

Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp et al., 1975, revolved around the issue of whether or not a municipal corporation that generates and sells electric power both for its own use and to other consumers could be classified as a "public utility" under Part II of the Federal Power Act (FPA). The court ruled in favor of Conway Corporation, stating that it was not subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission (now known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) because it did not fit within FPA's definition of public utilities. This decision was based on an interpretation of legislative intent behind FPA which suggested Congress intended to exclude governmental entities from this classification due to their accountability directly to voters rather than shareholders.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp., it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold federal jurisdiction over wholesale electricity sales by municipalities, even if they were within a single state, expanded the reach of federal power beyond what was intended by Congress in passing the Federal Power Act. The dissenters believed that this interpretation disregarded clear statutory language and legislative history indicating that such transactions should be exempt from regulation under Section 201(b) of the act. They also expressed concern about potential negative impacts on municipal utilities and their customers due to increased regulatory burdens and costs associated with compliance with federal rules. Furthermore, they contended that this ruling could undermine states' rights and local control over public utilities which have traditionally been regulated at a state or local level rather than federally.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jun 07, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms