Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.

• 1971 • 404 U.S. 453 • Burger Court
In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co., 1971, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Federal Power Commission (FPC). The issue at hand was whether or not FPC had jurisdiction over wholesale sales from a power company's system that included both licensed and unlicensed facilities. Florida Power & Light argued that such sales were outside FPC’s authority because they involved energy produced by non-federally regulated plants. However, the court held that if any...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1971
Docket: 70-38
404 U.S. 453
92 S. Ct. 637
30 L. Ed. 2d 600
1972 U.S. LEXIS 119
Argued: Nov 15, 1971

Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co., 1971, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Federal Power Commission (FPC). The issue at hand was whether or not FPC had jurisdiction over wholesale sales from a power company's system that included both licensed and unlicensed facilities. Florida Power & Light argued that such sales were outside FPC’s authority because they involved energy produced by non-federally regulated plants. However, the court held that if any part of an interconnected and coordinated electric system is subject to federal licensing, then all wholesale rates for electricity sold through this integrated network fall under FPC’s jurisdiction regardless of where it originated within said network. This decision affirmed FPC's ability to regulate interstate electricity transactions comprehensively.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co., Justice Douglas argued that the majority's decision to uphold the Federal Power Commission's (FPC) authority over wholesale electricity rates was a misinterpretation of the Federal Power Act. He contended that Congress intended to give FPC jurisdiction only over interstate transactions, not intrastate ones, and thus it should not have authority over Florida’s power company which operates solely within state lines. He also expressed concern about federal intrusion into areas traditionally regulated by states and warned against expanding federal powers at the expense of state sovereignty. Furthermore, he disagreed with how FPC calculated costs in setting rates, arguing they should consider future as well as past investments made by utilities companies.

Opinion written by Justice BRWhite
Decided: Jan 12, 1972
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms