Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. Et Al.

• 1971 • 406 U.S. 621 • Burger Court
In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 1971, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC) had jurisdiction over sales for resale of natural gas produced in federal offshore areas and sold directly to industrial users. The FPC claimed it did have such authority under Section 1(b) of Natural Gas Act as these transactions affected interstate commerce. However, Louisiana Power & Light Co., along with other...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1971
Docket: 71-1016
406 U.S. 621
92 S. Ct. 1827
32 L. Ed. 2d 369
1972 U.S. LEXIS 117
Argued: Apr 19, 1972

Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 1971, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether or not the Federal Power Commission (FPC) had jurisdiction over sales for resale of natural gas produced in federal offshore areas and sold directly to industrial users. The FPC claimed it did have such authority under Section 1(b) of Natural Gas Act as these transactions affected interstate commerce. However, Louisiana Power & Light Co., along with other respondents, argued that this interpretation exceeded statutory limits set by Congress and intruded on state regulatory power. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled in favor of FPC stating that its jurisdiction extended to all sales for resale in interstate commerce regardless if they were direct industrial sales or not.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., Justice Blackmun argued that the majority's decision to uphold federal jurisdiction over wholesale electricity rates, even when both buyer and seller are in the same state, was an unwarranted expansion of federal power. He contended that this interpretation went beyond what Congress intended with the Federal Power Act. According to him, it is not enough for a transaction to affect interstate commerce; it must be part of such commerce itself. The fact that excess energy might flow into an interconnected grid does not make every sale on that grid interstate in nature. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on states' rights and their ability to regulate local utilities effectively.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Jun 07, 1972
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms