Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division Et Al.

• 1972 • 411 U.S. 458 • Burger Court
In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division et al., 1972, the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4(e) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), a state utility commission does not have jurisdiction over rates charged by interstate natural gas companies for wholesale sales to local distribution companies. The court held that such authority lies solely with the Federal Power Commission (FPC). This decision came after Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division challenged an...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1972
Docket: 72-486
411 U.S. 458
93 S. Ct. 1723
36 L. Ed. 2d 426
1973 U.S. LEXIS 7
Argued: Mar 27, 1973

Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division et al., 1972, the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4(e) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), a state utility commission does not have jurisdiction over rates charged by interstate natural gas companies for wholesale sales to local distribution companies. The court held that such authority lies solely with the Federal Power Commission (FPC). This decision came after Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division challenged an increase in wholesale natural gas prices by United Gas Pipe Line Company. The Tennessee Public Service Commission had initially approved this rate hike but was later overturned by FPC which argued it alone has jurisdiction over these matters as per NGA provisions. The Supreme Court upheld FPC's position affirming its exclusive right to regulate interstate wholesales of natural gas.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Power Commission v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division et al., Justice Douglas argued that the majority's decision to uphold the Federal Power Commission's (FPC) jurisdiction over wholesale natural gas sales by pipelines directly to local distribution companies was a misinterpretation of both legislative intent and previous court rulings. He contended that Congress intended for state regulatory agencies, not federal ones like FPC, to oversee such transactions when it passed the Natural Gas Act in 1938. Furthermore, he pointed out that this ruling contradicted earlier decisions where similar cases were ruled under state jurisdiction. In his view, this case represented an unwarranted expansion of federal power into areas traditionally regulated by states and could potentially undermine their ability to effectively manage local energy markets.

Opinion written by Justice WODouglas
Decided: May 07, 1973
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms