Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Federal Power Commission v. Moss Et Al.

• 1975 • 424 U.S. 494 • Burger Court
In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Moss et al., 1975, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a natural gas company could not be exempted from certain regulatory requirements by claiming it was only involved in intrastate commerce. The court found that even though some aspects of the company's operations were purely local, its overall activities had significant effects on interstate commerce and thus fell under federal jurisdiction. This decision clarified the scope of federal power over...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1975
Docket: 74-883
424 U.S. 494
96 S. Ct. 1003
47 L. Ed. 2d 186
1976 U.S. LEXIS 125
Argued: Dec 03, 1975

Federal Power Commission v. Moss Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Federal Power Commission v. Moss et al., 1975, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a natural gas company could not be exempted from certain regulatory requirements by claiming it was only involved in intrastate commerce. The court found that even though some aspects of the company's operations were purely local, its overall activities had significant effects on interstate commerce and thus fell under federal jurisdiction. This decision clarified the scope of federal power over energy companies and reinforced previous rulings affirming broad congressional authority to regulate economic activity affecting more than one state.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Federal Power Commission v. Moss et al., Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision to uphold a federal regulation requiring natural gas companies to disclose their financial records was an overreach of governmental power and violated constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. He contended that such disclosures should only be required if there is reasonable cause to believe wrongdoing has occurred, rather than as a matter of routine oversight by regulatory agencies. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential misuse or abuse of this information by government officials or third parties, which could harm these businesses' competitive standing in the marketplace. Thus, while acknowledging the need for some level of transparency in business operations, he believed that this requirement went too far and infringed upon fundamental privacy rights protected under Fourth Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: Mar 03, 1976
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms