Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Frank v. Vollkomme

• 1906 • 205 U.S. 521 • Fuller Court
In the 1906 case Frank v. Vollkommer, the United States Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over property rights and inheritance laws. The plaintiff, Frank, was an heir to a deceased man's estate who had left his entire fortune to his widow in Germany without making any provisions for his children from a previous marriage living in America. After the widow died, her will stipulated that her wealth would be distributed among German charities rather than going to her stepchildren as per American...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1906
Docket: 184
205 U.S. 521
27 S. Ct. 596
51 L. Ed. 911
1907 U.S. LEXIS 1365
Argued: Jan 25, 1907

Frank v. Vollkomme

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1906 case Frank v. Vollkommer, the United States Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over property rights and inheritance laws. The plaintiff, Frank, was an heir to a deceased man's estate who had left his entire fortune to his widow in Germany without making any provisions for his children from a previous marriage living in America. After the widow died, her will stipulated that her wealth would be distributed among German charities rather than going to her stepchildren as per American law at that time which stated that if no provision is made for children in their parent's will then they are entitled to half of their parent’s estate after the death of both parents. Frank sued Vollkommer (the executor of the widow's will) arguing he should have received part of this inheritance under U.S law but lost both at trial and on appeal because it was determined by courts that German law applied since all parties were domiciled there when they died. The Supreme Court upheld these decisions stating it is not within its jurisdiction or power to interfere with foreign countries' administration or distribution of estates located within their territories even though different rules might apply domestically.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Frank v. Vollkomme argued that the majority's decision to uphold a lower court ruling, which held that an individual could be extradited from one state to another for trial on criminal charges even if they were not physically present in the state at the time of their alleged crime, was incorrect. The dissenting justices believed this interpretation violated constitutional protections against unlawful seizure and detention without due process. They contended that extradition should only apply when someone flees a jurisdiction after committing a crime there, not simply because they are accused of having committed an act elsewhere deemed illegal by another state's laws. This view emphasized respect for states' rights and individual liberties over broad interpretations of federal power.

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: Apr 29, 1907
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms