Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gallagher, Chief Of Police Of Springfield, Massachusetts, Et Al. v. Crown Kosher Super Market Of Massachusetts, Inc., Et Al.

• 1960 • 366 U.S. 617 • Warren Court
The Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market case of 1960 revolved around a Massachusetts law that prohibited certain businesses from operating on Sundays. The Crown Kosher Supermarket, along with other plaintiffs, challenged this law arguing it violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of religion as they observed Sabbath from Friday evening to Saturday evening and thus Sunday was their busiest day for business. They claimed the law disproportionately affected Jewish-owned businesses by...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 11
366 U.S. 617
81 S. Ct. 1122
6 L. Ed. 2d 536
1961 U.S. LEXIS 1060
Argued: Dec 07, 1960

Gallagher, Chief Of Police Of Springfield, Massachusetts, Et Al. v. Crown Kosher Super Market Of Massachusetts, Inc., Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market case of 1960 revolved around a Massachusetts law that prohibited certain businesses from operating on Sundays. The Crown Kosher Supermarket, along with other plaintiffs, challenged this law arguing it violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of religion as they observed Sabbath from Friday evening to Saturday evening and thus Sunday was their busiest day for business. They claimed the law disproportionately affected Jewish-owned businesses by forcing them to close two days a week instead of one like most other businesses. However, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Massachusetts Sunday closing laws in a 5-4 decision stating that these laws did not intend or promote religious discrimination but were rather enacted for secular purposes such as providing a uniform day off work for all citizens regardless of faith.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market, Justice Frankfurter argued that Massachusetts' Sunday closing laws did not violate the First Amendment's prohibition of establishing a religion. He pointed out that these laws were part of a long-standing tradition aimed at providing a uniform day of rest for all citizens and had no religious intent or purpose. Furthermore, he contended that such regulations should be evaluated based on their secular effects rather than any incidental religious benefits they might provide. In his view, if every law with some indirect religious benefit was deemed unconstitutional, it would lead to an impractical level of scrutiny and could potentially invalidate many beneficial social policies.

Opinion written by Justice EWarren
Decided: May 29, 1961
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms