Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Alida Star Gebser And Alida Jean Mccullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District

• 1997 • 524 U.S. 274 • Rehnquist Court
In the case of Alida Star Gebser and Alida Jean McCullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 1997, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a school district cannot be held financially liable under Title IX for teacher-student sexual harassment unless an official who has authority to address the harassment knows about it and is deliberately indifferent. The case arose when a middle-school student in Texas was sexually harassed by her teacher. Despite complaints from other students and parents...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1997
Docket: 96-1866
524 U.S. 274
118 S. Ct. 1989
141 L. Ed. 2d 277
1998 U.S. LEXIS 4173
Argued: Mar 25, 1998

Alida Star Gebser And Alida Jean Mccullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Alida Star Gebser and Alida Jean McCullough v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 1997, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that a school district cannot be held financially liable under Title IX for teacher-student sexual harassment unless an official who has authority to address the harassment knows about it and is deliberately indifferent. The case arose when a middle-school student in Texas was sexually harassed by her teacher. Despite complaints from other students and parents about inappropriate behavior, no formal complaint was made until after the relationship became sexual. When informed, the school fired him immediately but argued they were not responsible as they had no prior knowledge of his misconducts with this particular student before firing him.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, Justice Stevens argued that the majority's decision to limit Title IX liability was inconsistent with previous rulings and Congressional intent. He asserted that a school district should be held liable if it is deliberately indifferent to known acts of teacher-student harassment, regardless of whether an official policy exists or not. Furthermore, he contended that requiring actual notice to a school official who has authority to address discrimination effectively immunizes negligent conduct by schools and undermines Title IX's purpose - preventing sex-based discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds. In his view, this ruling could discourage victims from reporting abuse due to fear their complaints may not reach someone with sufficient authority under the Court’s standard.

Opinion written by Justice SDOConnor
Decided: Jun 22, 1998
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms