Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

George W. Bush & Sons Company v. Maloy Et Al., Constituting The Public Service Commission Of Maryland

• 1924 • 267 U.S. 317 • Taft Court
In the case of George W. Bush & Sons Company v. Maloy et al., constituting the Public Service Commission of Maryland, 1924, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state could regulate rates for interstate commerce conducted by ferries operating within its boundaries. The George W. Bush & Sons Company operated a ferry service between Baltimore and Philadelphia and argued that as an interstate operation, it should not be subject to regulation by Maryland's Public Service...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1924
Docket: 185
267 U.S. 317
45 S. Ct. 326
69 L. Ed. 627
1925 U.S. LEXIS 757
Argued: Jan 16, 1925

George W. Bush & Sons Company v. Maloy Et Al., Constituting The Public Service Commission Of Maryland

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of George W. Bush & Sons Company v. Maloy et al., constituting the Public Service Commission of Maryland, 1924, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a state could regulate rates for interstate commerce conducted by ferries operating within its boundaries. The George W. Bush & Sons Company operated a ferry service between Baltimore and Philadelphia and argued that as an interstate operation, it should not be subject to regulation by Maryland's Public Service Commission (PSC). However, PSC contended that since part of their operations took place in Maryland waters they had jurisdiction over them. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of PSC stating that while Congress has exclusive authority over interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause, states can exercise control when such activities take place within their borders unless federal law preempts this power or if it places an undue burden on interstate commerce. In this case neither condition applied hence upholding PSC’s right to regulate rates charged by ferries operating within its territorial waters even though they were engaged in interstate trade.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for George W. Bush & Sons Company v. Maloy et al., it was argued that the Public Service Commission of Maryland did not have jurisdiction over interstate commerce, and therefore could not regulate rates charged by a private wharf company for services rendered to vessels engaged in such commerce. The dissenting justices believed that only Congress had this power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, and any attempt by a state agency to exert control over these matters would be unconstitutional. They also disagreed with the majority's interpretation of previous case law on this issue, arguing instead that those cases supported their view that states cannot interfere with or regulate interstate commerce in any way without express permission from Congress.

Opinion written by Justice LDBrandeis
Decided: Mar 02, 1925
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms