Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gibbons v. United States

• 1869 • 75 U.S. 269 • Chase Court
Gibbons v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The case was brought by Thomas Gibbons, a steamboat operator who had been denied a license to operate a steamboat service between New York and New Jersey. Gibbons argued that the federal government had the power to regulate interstate commerce, and that the state of New York had no authority to deny him a license. The Supreme Court agreed with Gibbons, ruling that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
75 U.S. 269
19 L. Ed. 453
1868 U.S. LEXIS 1097
Argued: Nov 15, 1869

Gibbons v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Gibbons v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The case was brought by Thomas Gibbons, a steamboat operator who had been denied a license to operate a steamboat service between New York and New Jersey. Gibbons argued that the federal government had the power to regulate interstate commerce, and that the state of New York had no authority to deny him a license. The Supreme Court agreed with Gibbons, ruling that the federal government had the power to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The Court held that the Commerce Clause gave Congress the power to regulate commerce between states, and that the state of New York had no authority to interfere with Gibbons' business. The Court also held that the federal government had the power to regulate commerce even if it was conducted within a single state. The decision in Gibbons v. United States was a major victory for the federal government, as it established the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since, and has been used to uphold the power of Congress to regulate a wide range of activities, including labor, transportation, and environmental protection.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Gibbons v. United States, Chief Justice Chase delivered a dissenting opinion in which he argued that Congress had exceeded its authority under the Commerce Clause by passing an act to regulate navigation between states. He asserted that this was not within the scope of congressional power and instead should be left up to individual state legislatures. Furthermore, he argued that if Congress were allowed to pass such laws then it would have virtually unlimited power over commerce among all states and territories, leading to potential abuses of federal authority. In conclusion, Chief Justice Chase believed that allowing Congress such expansive powers could lead to tyranny and oppression from Washington D.C., thus violating fundamental principles of liberty enshrined in our Constitution.

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Dec 13, 1869
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms