Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Girard Insurance And Trust Company v. Cooper

• 1895 • 162 U.S. 529 • Fuller Court
In the case of Girard Insurance and Trust Company v. Cooper in 1895, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a Pennsylvania law that allowed for an increased tax on corporations violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiff, Girard Insurance and Trust Company, argued that this law unfairly targeted them while exempting other types of businesses from similar taxation. However, the court ruled against Girard Insurance and Trust Company stating that...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1895
Docket: 164
162 U.S. 529
16 S. Ct. 879
40 L. Ed. 1062
1896 U.S. LEXIS 2231
Argued: Mar 23, 1896

Girard Insurance And Trust Company v. Cooper

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Girard Insurance and Trust Company v. Cooper in 1895, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a Pennsylvania law that allowed for an increased tax on corporations violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The plaintiff, Girard Insurance and Trust Company, argued that this law unfairly targeted them while exempting other types of businesses from similar taxation. However, the court ruled against Girard Insurance and Trust Company stating that it is within a state’s power to classify different kinds of property for purposes of taxation as long as it does not violate any specific federal constitutional prohibition. Therefore, they found no violation of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment since all corporations were taxed equally under this particular statute.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Girard Insurance and Trust Company v. Cooper, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania law allowing corporations to be sued in any county where they do business was incorrect. The dissent contended that this law violated both due process rights and equal protection principles under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S Constitution. It asserted that corporations should not be subjected to lawsuits in counties where they have no actual presence or property, as this would place an undue burden on them and could potentially lead to unfair outcomes. Furthermore, it suggested that treating corporations differently from individuals in terms of their legal vulnerability constituted unequal treatment under the law.

Opinion written by Justice HBBrown
Decided: Apr 20, 1896
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms