Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gomillion Et Al. v. Lightfoot, Mayor Of Tuskegee, Et Al.

• 1960 • 364 U.S. 339 • Warren Court
In the Gomillion v. Lightfoot case of 1960, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that electoral district boundaries drawn only to disenfranchise blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. The city of Tuskegee, Alabama had redrafted its city limits into a 28-sided figure designed to exclude nearly all black residents while not excluding a single white resident. Charles Gomillion and other African American citizens sued Mayor Phillip Lightfoot claiming this act was racially discriminatory and infringed on...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1960
Docket: 32
364 U.S. 339
81 S. Ct. 125
5 L. Ed. 2d 110
1960 U.S. LEXIS 189
Argued: Oct 18, 1960

Gomillion Et Al. v. Lightfoot, Mayor Of Tuskegee, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Gomillion v. Lightfoot case of 1960, the U.S Supreme Court ruled that electoral district boundaries drawn only to disenfranchise blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. The city of Tuskegee, Alabama had redrafted its city limits into a 28-sided figure designed to exclude nearly all black residents while not excluding a single white resident. Charles Gomillion and other African American citizens sued Mayor Phillip Lightfoot claiming this act was racially discriminatory and infringed on their right to vote. The court unanimously held that such racial gerrymandering constituted an unconstitutional effort to limit black voting power under the guise of geographic reclassification, thus violating equal protection laws as well as political and civil rights of African Americans protected by the Constitution.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the Gomillion v. Lightfoot case, there was no dissenting opinion recorded. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Alabama's redrawing of Tuskegee city boundaries to exclude black voters violated the 15th Amendment, which prohibits states from denying or abridging citizens' right to vote on account of race or color. Therefore, all justices concurred with this decision and none expressed a differing viewpoint in an official capacity.

Opinion written by Justice FFrankfurter
Decided: Nov 14, 1960
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms