Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell, Individually And As Comptroller Of The State Of New York, Et Al.

• 1922 • 261 U.S. 1 • Taft Court
The Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell case in 1922 revolved around the issue of taxation on out-of-state corporations operating within New York State. The plaintiff, Gorham Manufacturing Company, a Rhode Island corporation with business operations in New York, challenged the constitutionality of a tax imposed by the state on its capital stock used and employed within New York. The company argued that this was an infringement upon interstate commerce and violated their rights under both...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taft Court
Term: 1922
Docket: 196
261 U.S. 1
43 S. Ct. 313
67 L. Ed. 505
1923 U.S. LEXIS 2522
Argued: Jan 22, 1923

Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell, Individually And As Comptroller Of The State Of New York, Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell case in 1922 revolved around the issue of taxation on out-of-state corporations operating within New York State. The plaintiff, Gorham Manufacturing Company, a Rhode Island corporation with business operations in New York, challenged the constitutionality of a tax imposed by the state on its capital stock used and employed within New York. The company argued that this was an infringement upon interstate commerce and violated their rights under both the Commerce Clause and Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. However, the U.S Supreme Court upheld the legality of such taxes stating they were not discriminatory or burdensome to interstate commerce as long as they were applied equally to all businesses operating within state boundaries regardless of where they are incorporated. Furthermore, it ruled that there was no violation against equal protection since different states have differing methods for taxing foreign corporations which does not necessarily constitute discrimination.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Gorham Manufacturing Company v. Wendell, argued that the majority's decision to uphold a New York law taxing foreign corporations for their capital within and outside the state was incorrect. The dissenters believed this ruling violated both due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. They contended that it was unjust to tax a corporation based on its total capital when only a portion of that capital is used or has presence in New York State. This taxation method, they argued, unfairly burdened out-of-state companies compared to local ones who were taxed solely on their assets within state borders - thus violating principles of equality under law as well as interstate commerce protections.

Opinion written by Justice WHTaft
Decided: Feb 19, 1923
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms