Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Granny Goose Foods, Inc., Et Al. v. Brotherhood Of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 Of Alameda County, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of America

• 1973 • 415 U.S. 423 • Burger Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Granny Goose Foods, Inc., et al. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 of Alameda County, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America in 1973 revolved around the issue of whether a federal court could issue an injunction to enforce its own orders while those orders were being appealed by one party involved in the dispute. Granny Goose Foods had obtained temporary restraining orders against the union...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1973
Docket: 72-1566
415 U.S. 423
94 S. Ct. 1113
39 L. Ed. 2d 435
1974 U.S. LEXIS 31
Argued: Jan 08, 1974

Granny Goose Foods, Inc., Et Al. v. Brotherhood Of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 Of Alameda County, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Of America

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Granny Goose Foods, Inc., et al. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 of Alameda County, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America in 1973 revolved around the issue of whether a federal court could issue an injunction to enforce its own orders while those orders were being appealed by one party involved in the dispute. Granny Goose Foods had obtained temporary restraining orders against the union from a District Court during labor disputes and strikes; however, these were violated by the union members leading to contempt proceedings initiated by Granny Goose Foods. While these proceedings were pending appeal at Ninth Circuit Court level (which stayed enforcement), Granny Goose sought relief from Supreme Court arguing that stay issued was invalid as it prevented them from enforcing their rights under original order. The Supreme Court ruled that automatic stays on district court rulings during appeals do not apply when there is evidence showing irreparable harm if immediate action isn't taken or where public interest is involved - thus allowing for exceptions to be made for issuing injunctions even while cases are under appeal.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 of Alameda County, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America (1973), Justice William O. Douglas argued that the majority's decision was a departure from established precedent and an overreach by the judiciary into labor disputes best left to arbitration or negotiation between parties involved in collective bargaining agreements under federal law. He contended that courts should not interfere with strikes unless there is clear evidence they are illegal or causing irreparable harm beyond ordinary economic damage suffered during labor disputes; otherwise it could chill legitimate union activity and undermine workers' rights to collectively bargain for better conditions and wages.

Opinion written by Justice TMarshall
Decided: Mar 04, 1974
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms