Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Graves, Governor Of Alabama, Et Al. v. Texas Company

• 1935 • 298 U.S. 393 • Hughes Court
In the case of Graves, Governor of Alabama, et al. v. Texas Company in 1935, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over taxation between states and private corporations. The Texas Company (now Texaco) was an oil company incorporated in Delaware with operations across several states including Alabama. When Alabama imposed a franchise tax on out-of-state companies operating within its borders, the Texas Company challenged this as unconstitutional under both due process and commerce clause...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1935
Docket: 727
298 U.S. 393
56 S. Ct. 818
80 L. Ed. 1236
1936 U.S. LEXIS 712
Argued: Apr 02, 1936

Graves, Governor Of Alabama, Et Al. v. Texas Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Graves, Governor of Alabama, et al. v. Texas Company in 1935, the Supreme Court ruled on a dispute over taxation between states and private corporations. The Texas Company (now Texaco) was an oil company incorporated in Delaware with operations across several states including Alabama. When Alabama imposed a franchise tax on out-of-state companies operating within its borders, the Texas Company challenged this as unconstitutional under both due process and commerce clause grounds. The Supreme Court sided with Alabama unanimously upholding that state's right to impose such taxes on foreign corporations doing business within their jurisdiction without violating either due process or interstate commerce protections. The court reasoned that while businesses may operate across state lines they are still subject to local laws and regulations where they conduct their activities - including taxation.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Graves, Governor of Alabama, et al. v. Texas Company (1935), Justice Stone argued that a state should not be allowed to tax interstate commerce if it results in multiple taxation burdens on the same entity or transaction. He believed this would violate the Commerce Clause of the U.S Constitution which gives Congress exclusive power over interstate commerce and prohibits states from interfering with it. In his view, allowing such taxes could lead to economic protectionism by individual states and disrupt national unity in commercial matters - something he felt was against what framers intended when they drafted the constitution.

Opinion written by Justice PButler
Decided: May 18, 1936
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms