Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Gray Et Al. v. Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Tennessee Et Al.

• 1951 • 342 U.S. 517 • Vinson Court
In the case of Gray et al. v. Board of Trustees of the University of Tennessee et al., African American students sought admission to a state-supported graduate school, The University Of Tennessee College Of Law, which was racially segregated at that time. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on June 4, 1951 stating that if there is no comparable law school for black students within the state then they must be admitted to this university under equal protection clause (14th...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1951
Docket: 120
342 U.S. 517
72 S. Ct. 432
96 L. Ed. 2d 540
1952 U.S. LEXIS 2389
Argued: Jan 09, 1952

Gray Et Al. v. Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Tennessee Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Gray et al. v. Board of Trustees of the University of Tennessee et al., African American students sought admission to a state-supported graduate school, The University Of Tennessee College Of Law, which was racially segregated at that time. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on June 4, 1951 stating that if there is no comparable law school for black students within the state then they must be admitted to this university under equal protection clause (14th Amendment). This decision followed previous rulings where segregation was deemed unconstitutional when "separate but equal" facilities were not truly equivalent or did not exist at all for one racial group.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Gray et al. v. Board of Trustees of the University of Tennessee et al., Justice Minton argued that by denying admission to African American students based on their race, the University was in violation of the Equal Protection Clause under Fourteenth Amendment. He believed that separate but equal doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson should not be applied to education because it inherently creates inequality and is therefore unconstitutional. Furthermore, he contended that waiting for states to voluntarily desegregate would only perpetuate racial discrimination and delay justice for African Americans who were entitled to equal educational opportunities immediately as per Constitution's mandate.

Opinion written by Justice
Decided: Mar 03, 1952
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms