In the 1908 case of Gray v. Noholoa, the United States Supreme Court addressed a dispute over land ownership in Hawaii. The plaintiff, Francis M. Gray, claimed that he had purchased a piece of property from its original owner and had subsequently been denied possession by defendant David Noholoa who asserted his own claim to the land based on an alleged prior purchase agreement with the same original owner. The lower court ruled in favor of Noholoa due to lack of evidence supporting Gray's claim; however, upon appeal to the Supreme Court it was found that there were errors made during trial proceedings which may have affected this outcome - specifically regarding witness testimonies and their credibility assessment by jury members without proper instruction from presiding judge as required under law at time for such cases involving real estate transactions or disputes thereof between parties involved therein. Therefore, judgment was reversed and case remanded back down for new trial where these issues could be properly addressed according to established legal standards.

The Gray v. Noholoa case does not have a publicly available dissenting opinion recorded in the official reports of U.S Supreme Court decisions, making it impossible to provide a summary for such an opinion. It's important to note that not all court cases will have dissenting opinions; these are typically written by justices who disagree with the majority ruling and wish to express their differing viewpoints or interpretations of law. In some instances, all justices may agree on the outcome of a case, resulting in unanimous decision without any dissenting opinions.