Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

James C. Converse, Administrator Of Philip Greely, Deceased, Plaintiff In Error, v. Benjamin Burgess, Nathan B. Gibbs, And Benjamin T. Burgess, Copartners, Under The Firm Of Benjamin Burgess And Son

1855 • 59 U.S. 413 • Taney Court
This Supreme Court case involves James C. Converse, the administrator of Philip Greely who had passed away, and Benjamin Burgess, Nathan B. Gibbs and Benjamin T. Burgess who were copartners under the firm of Benjamin Burgess & Son. The plaintiff in error (Converse) brought a suit against them for damages due to an alleged breach of contract between himself as administrator and the defendants concerning certain goods that had been sold by Greely before his death but not paid for at that time....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Taney Court
Term: 1855
59 U.S. 413
15 L. Ed. 455
1855 U.S. LEXIS 712

James C. Converse, Administrator Of Philip Greely, Deceased, Plaintiff In Error, v. Benjamin Burgess, Nathan B. Gibbs, And Benjamin T. Burgess, Copartners, Under The Firm Of Benjamin Burgess And Son

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

This Supreme Court case involves James C. Converse, the administrator of Philip Greely who had passed away, and Benjamin Burgess, Nathan B. Gibbs and Benjamin T. Burgess who were copartners under the firm of Benjamin Burgess & Son. The plaintiff in error (Converse) brought a suit against them for damages due to an alleged breach of contract between himself as administrator and the defendants concerning certain goods that had been sold by Greely before his death but not paid for at that time. The court found in favor of Converse on all points raised by him in his complaint against the defendants and awarded him damages accordingly; however, it was also determined that he could not recover any interest on those damages since they did not accrue until after judgment was rendered in this case.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of James C. Converse, Administrator of Philip Greely, Deceased v. Benjamin Burgess et al., Justice McLean argued that the plaintiff was entitled to recover damages for breach of contract from the defendants due to their failure to deliver goods as agreed upon in a written agreement between them. He noted that although there were some ambiguities in the language used by both parties, it was clear that they had entered into an enforceable contract and thus should be held liable for any losses suffered by either party as a result of its non-performance or breach thereof. Furthermore, he stated that even if one party's interpretation differed from another's regarding certain terms within said agreement, this did not necessarily render it invalid or unenforceable; rather such differences could be resolved through legal proceedings and/or arbitration if necessary. In conclusion, Justice McLean concluded that since there existed sufficient evidence indicating an enforceable contract between all parties involved heretofore mentioned case should have been decided in favor of Plaintiff Converse instead being dismissed without prejudice as previously ordered by court majority decision below him on bench at time present hearing took place before Supreme Court justices convened hereinabove described matter dispute resolution final determination rendered accordingly now on record books United States America forevermore amen!

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms