Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Green Et Al. v. County School Board Of New Kent County Et Al.

• 1967 • 391 U.S. 430 • Warren Court
In the case of Green et al. v. County School Board of New Kent County et al., 1967, the U.S Supreme Court ruled against a "freedom-of-choice" plan adopted by New Kent County in Virginia as it perpetuated racial segregation rather than eliminating it. The county had two schools: one was predominantly black while the other was all white and parents could choose where to send their children under this plan. However, no white students opted for the black school and only a small number of black...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1967
Docket: 695
391 U.S. 430
88 S. Ct. 1689
20 L. Ed. 2d 716
1968 U.S. LEXIS 1551
Argued: Apr 03, 1968

Green Et Al. v. County School Board Of New Kent County Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Green et al. v. County School Board of New Kent County et al., 1967, the U.S Supreme Court ruled against a "freedom-of-choice" plan adopted by New Kent County in Virginia as it perpetuated racial segregation rather than eliminating it. The county had two schools: one was predominantly black while the other was all white and parents could choose where to send their children under this plan. However, no white students opted for the black school and only a small number of black students chose to attend the white school which maintained segregation effectively despite Brown v Board decision that declared segregated public schools unconstitutional in 1954. The court held that such freedom-of-choice plans were unacceptable if they led to or preserved racially discriminatory results; hence, local authorities were obligated not just to avoid discrimination but also eliminate it root and branch.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Green et al. v. County School Board of New Kent County et al., Justice Hugo Black argued that the court was overstepping its bounds by dictating specific methods to achieve racial balance in schools, rather than simply ensuring equal opportunity under law. He contended that it is not within the Court's power or expertise to determine how best to integrate schools and eliminate segregation, but rather this responsibility lies with local school authorities who are better equipped with knowledge of their own communities' needs and circumstances. Furthermore, he expressed concern about potential negative impacts on education quality due to forced busing or other artificial means of achieving integration.

Opinion written by Justice WJBrennan
Decided: May 27, 1968
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms