Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Green Et Al. v. United States

• 1957 • 356 U.S. 165 • Warren Court
In the case of Green et al. v. United States in 1957, the Supreme Court ruled on an issue related to double jeopardy and capital punishment. The defendant, Green, was initially charged with both first-degree murder and arson but was only found guilty of arson by a jury. However, after appealing his conviction successfully due to a technical error during his trial process, he was retried for both charges again - this time being convicted of first-degree murder which carried a death...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1957
Docket: 100
356 U.S. 165
78 S. Ct. 632
2 L. Ed. 2d 672
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1756
Argued: Oct 21, 1957

Green Et Al. v. United States

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Green et al. v. United States in 1957, the Supreme Court ruled on an issue related to double jeopardy and capital punishment. The defendant, Green, was initially charged with both first-degree murder and arson but was only found guilty of arson by a jury. However, after appealing his conviction successfully due to a technical error during his trial process, he was retried for both charges again - this time being convicted of first-degree murder which carried a death sentence. Green appealed this decision arguing that it violated the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause as he had already been acquitted for the charge of first-degree murder in his initial trial. The Supreme Court agreed with him stating that retrying him on a charge he had previously been acquitted from constituted double jeopardy even if it occurred within one continuous court proceeding or judicial session. The ruling clarified that once an individual has been acquitted from any given offense they cannot be tried again for that same offense regardless if new evidence emerges or there were errors made during their original trial proceedings.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Green et al. v. United States, Justice Black argued that the majority's decision violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment by allowing a defendant to be tried twice for essentially the same crime. He contended that when Green was initially acquitted of first-degree murder but convicted of second-degree murder in his first trial, it should have been considered as an implicit acquittal on all charges related to first-degree murder due to lack of evidence supporting such conviction. Therefore, retrying him on this charge after he successfully appealed his second-degree murder conviction constituted double jeopardy according to Justice Black's interpretation. The justice also expressed concern about potential abuses and unfairness resulting from permitting prosecutors multiple attempts at securing convictions for more serious offenses after initial failures.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(2)
Decided: Mar 31, 1958
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms