Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Grenada County Supervisors & Others v. Brogden & Others

• 1884 • 112 U.S. 261 • Waite Court
Grenada County Supervisors & Others v. Brogden & Others was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1884. The case involved a dispute between the Grenada County Supervisors and the Brogdens over the ownership of a piece of land. The Brogdens had purchased the land from the state of Mississippi in 1858, but the Supervisors argued that the land had been illegally taken from the county in 1856. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Brogdens, finding that the state had the right to...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1884
Docket: 37
112 U.S. 261
5 S. Ct. 125
28 L. Ed. 704
1884 U.S. LEXIS 1880

Grenada County Supervisors & Others v. Brogden & Others

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Grenada County Supervisors & Others v. Brogden & Others was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1884. The case involved a dispute between the Grenada County Supervisors and the Brogdens over the ownership of a piece of land. The Brogdens had purchased the land from the state of Mississippi in 1858, but the Supervisors argued that the land had been illegally taken from the county in 1856. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Brogdens, finding that the state had the right to sell the land and that the county had no legal claim to it. The Court also held that the county had failed to prove that the land had been illegally taken from them. The decision established that the state had the right to sell land that it had acquired from a county, even if the county had not given its consent.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion of Grenada County Supervisors & Others v. Brogden & Others, Justice Field argued that the majority had misapplied Mississippi law in their decision. He noted that under Mississippi law, a contract was not rendered invalid by an error in its description if it could be identified from other facts and circumstances surrounding it. In this case, he believed there were sufficient facts to identify the property being sold even though there was an error in its description; thus, he felt that the contract should have been enforced as written rather than declared void due to a technicality. Furthermore, Justice Field argued that since both parties had acted upon and accepted benefits from the agreement for many years without objection or dispute until after one party attempted to sell his interest in it - which would have resulted in financial loss for him - then they should be held accountable according to what they agreed upon originally instead of allowing them to escape liability on account of a minor mistake made at inception.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: Nov 17, 1884
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms