Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Grovey v. Townsend

• 1934 • 295 U.S. 45 • Hughes Court
In the Grovey v. Townsend case of 1934, the U.S Supreme Court upheld a Texas statute that authorized white-only primaries conducted by private organizations. The plaintiff, R.R. Grovey, an African American man was denied a ballot in a Democratic primary election due to his race and sued on grounds of racial discrimination violating his Fourteenth Amendment rights. However, the court ruled unanimously against him stating that since political parties were private entities they could establish...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1934
Docket: 563
295 U.S. 45
55 S. Ct. 622
79 L. Ed. 1292
1935 U.S. LEXIS 303
Argued: Mar 11, 1935

Grovey v. Townsend

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the Grovey v. Townsend case of 1934, the U.S Supreme Court upheld a Texas statute that authorized white-only primaries conducted by private organizations. The plaintiff, R.R. Grovey, an African American man was denied a ballot in a Democratic primary election due to his race and sued on grounds of racial discrimination violating his Fourteenth Amendment rights. However, the court ruled unanimously against him stating that since political parties were private entities they could establish their own rules for membership including excluding non-whites from voting in their primaries. This decision effectively endorsed segregation within political processes and allowed discriminatory practices to continue unchecked until it was later overturned by Smith v Allwright (1944).

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Grovey v. Townsend, Justice Benjamin Cardozo expressed his disagreement with the majority's decision to uphold Texas' white primaries law. He argued that this law was a clear violation of the 15th Amendment, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting rights. According to him, by allowing political parties to exclude African Americans from participating in primary elections, Texas effectively denied them their constitutional right to vote since these primaries often determined the outcome of general elections. He further contended that political parties were not private entities but public ones due to their significant role in electoral processes and should therefore be subject to federal laws prohibiting racial discrimination. Thus, he believed that it was unconstitutional for states like Texas to permit such discriminatory practices within these organizations.

Opinion written by Justice OJRoberts
Decided: Apr 01, 1935
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms