Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Haig, Secretary Of State v. Agee

• 1980 • 453 U.S. 280 • Burger Court
In the 1980 case Haig, Secretary of State v. Agee, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government's right to revoke a citizen's passport on grounds of national security and foreign policy considerations. Philip Agee was a former CIA agent who had begun revealing classified information about agency operations after leaving his position. The State Department revoked his passport in 1979 under its statutory authority to deny passports for reasons of national security or foreign policy,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Burger Court
Term: 1980
Docket: 80-83
453 U.S. 280
101 S. Ct. 2766
69 L. Ed. 2d 640
1981 U.S. LEXIS 39
Argued: Jan 14, 1981

Haig, Secretary Of State v. Agee

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1980 case Haig, Secretary of State v. Agee, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the government's right to revoke a citizen's passport on grounds of national security and foreign policy considerations. Philip Agee was a former CIA agent who had begun revealing classified information about agency operations after leaving his position. The State Department revoked his passport in 1979 under its statutory authority to deny passports for reasons of national security or foreign policy, arguing that Agee’s actions were causing significant damage to U.S interests abroad by endangering lives and disrupting relations with other countries. In response, Agee claimed this violated his Fifth Amendment due process rights and First Amendment free speech rights. The court held that while travel is indeed protected under the Fifth Amendment as an aspect of liberty, it does not constrain Congress from regulating international travel within constitutional limits set by due process - which they found were met here given sufficient notice and opportunity for hearing provided before revocation occurred. Furthermore, they rejected Agee’s First Amendment claim stating that though freedom of speech is highly valued; it doesn't protect actions having potentially grave consequences like those caused by him disclosing classified information.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Haig v. Agee, Justice Brennan argued that the majority's decision to uphold the revocation of Agee's passport on national security grounds was a violation of his First Amendment rights. He contended that such an action constituted prior restraint on speech and should be subjected to strict scrutiny, which it would not withstand in this case. Moreover, he criticized the majority for deferring too much to executive power without sufficient evidence or justification for doing so. In his view, there were other less restrictive means available to protect national security interests without infriving upon individual constitutional rights as drastically as revoking a citizen’s passport does.

Opinion written by Justice WEBurger
Decided: Jun 29, 1981
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms