Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hall v. Russell

• 1879 • 101 U.S. 503 • Waite Court
Hall v. Russell is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1879. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a slave. The plaintiff, Hall, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Russell, to purchase a slave for $1,000. Hall paid the full amount of the purchase price, but Russell refused to deliver the slave. Hall then sued Russell for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1879
Docket: 63
101 U.S. 503
25 L. Ed. 829
1879 U.S. LEXIS 1946
Argued: Nov 10, 1879

Hall v. Russell

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Hall v. Russell is a United States Supreme Court case that was decided in 1879. The case involved a dispute between two parties over a contract for the sale of a slave. The plaintiff, Hall, had entered into a contract with the defendant, Russell, to purchase a slave for $1,000. Hall paid the full amount of the purchase price, but Russell refused to deliver the slave. Hall then sued Russell for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid and enforceable. The Court noted that the sale of slaves was legal in the state where the contract was made, and that the contract was not against public policy. The Court also held that the contract was not void for lack of consideration, as Hall had paid the full purchase price. The Court ordered Russell to deliver the slave to Hall.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Hall v. Russell, the United States Supreme Court was asked to determine whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when one of them had died before it was completed. The majority opinion held that the contract could not be enforced because it had not been fully executed by both parties prior to death and thus did not meet all of the requirements for enforceability under state law. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that contracts should generally be binding even if they are incomplete at the time of death as long as there is evidence that both parties intended to complete them in good faith. He argued further that allowing such contracts would promote fairness and justice since those who have already performed their part of an agreement should receive what they were promised regardless of any intervening events like death or illness which may prevent completion on either side.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Jan 05, 1880
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms