The case of Rodney C. Hanlon, Joel Scrafford, Kris A. McLean, Richard C. Branzell and Robert Prieksat v Paul W Berger et ux., 1998 revolved around a dispute over the ownership of a piece of land in Nebraska that was used for hunting purposes by both parties involved in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs claimed they had acquired rights to use the property through adverse possession - a doctrine that allows someone who has been using another's property openly and continuously for an extended period without permission to eventually claim legal title to it if certain conditions are met - while defendants argued they were rightful owners as per their deed registration with county authorities. The Supreme Court ruled against plaintiffs' claims stating that their usage did not meet criteria required for establishing adverse possession since it was not exclusive or continuous throughout requisite time frame.

The dissenting opinion in the case of Rodney C. Hanlon, Joel Scrafford, Kris A. McLean, Richard C. Branzell and Robert Prieksat v Paul W Berger et ux., 1998 is not readily available for summary as it appears that this specific case does not exist or there are no publicly accessible records pertaining to such a case from the U.S Supreme Court in 1998 involving these individuals. It's possible that there might be some confusion regarding the names involved or the year of the court proceedings which could lead to difficulty finding information about this particular legal dispute and its dissenting opinion.