Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Haskins v. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company & Another

• 1883 • 109 U.S. 106 • Waite Court
In Haskins v. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company & Another, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to determine whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Haskins, was a passenger on the train when it collided with another train. He was injured in the accident and sued the railroad company for damages. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident. The Court found that the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1883
Docket: 15
109 U.S. 106
3 S. Ct. 72
27 L. Ed. 873
1883 U.S. LEXIS 938

Haskins v. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company & Another

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Haskins v. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company & Another, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to determine whether a railroad company was liable for damages caused by a train accident. The plaintiff, Haskins, was a passenger on the train when it collided with another train. He was injured in the accident and sued the railroad company for damages. The Supreme Court held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident. The Court found that the railroad company had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of its trains and that it had breached this duty by failing to take proper precautions to prevent the accident. The Court also held that the railroad company was liable for the damages caused by the accident, even though the accident was caused by the negligence of another train's engineer. The Court's decision established that railroad companies have a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation of their trains and that they are liable for damages caused by their negligence. This decision has been cited in numerous cases since then and has been used to establish the liability of railroad companies for damages caused by their negligence.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Justice Field delivered the dissenting opinion in Haskins v. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Company & Another, arguing that the majority's decision was contrary to established law and precedent. He argued that a contract between two parties should be enforced according to its terms unless there is some legal reason why it should not be, such as fraud or mistake of fact on either side. In this case, he believed that no such reasons existed and thus the contract should have been enforced as written by both parties without any modification from the court. Furthermore, Justice Field argued that if one party had made an error in entering into a contract then they must bear responsibility for their own mistakes rather than expecting another party to pay for them through modifications of contracts after-the-fact by courts or legislatures.

Opinion written by Justice MRWaite
Decided: Oct 29, 1883
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms