Opinion summary
Etalia.ai summary of the majority opinion
The case involved Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. challenging the State of Hawaii's imposition of a tax on its gross receipts from transporting passengers and cargo between the islands. The airline argued that this state taxation was preempted by federal law under the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), which aimed to create a uniform system for regulating air carriers' rates, routes, and services without interference from individual states. The Supreme Court held that Hawaii's tax did not interfere with these objectives because it applied uniformly to all businesses operating within the state and did not specifically target airlines or affect their pricing structures directly. Therefore, it was not preempted by federal law as it fell within traditional areas of state regulation concerning taxes.
Opinion written by Justice Marshall
Decided 1 Nov 1983 · Official report