Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hedden v. Iselin

• 1891 • 142 U.S. 676 • Fuller Court
In the case of Hedden v. Iselin, 1891, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a certain type of woolen cloth known as "ladies' cloth" could be classified under the tariff act for duty purposes as a worsted fabric or not. The plaintiff, George W. Hedden (Collector of Customs), argued that it should be classified as such and thus subject to higher duties while defendant Augustus I. Iselin contended otherwise. The court ruled in favor of Hedden stating that although technically...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1891
Docket: 144
142 U.S. 676
12 S. Ct. 330
35 L. Ed. 1155
1892 U.S. LEXIS 2002
Argued: Jan 07, 1892

Hedden v. Iselin

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hedden v. Iselin, 1891, the U.S Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a certain type of woolen cloth known as "ladies' cloth" could be classified under the tariff act for duty purposes as a worsted fabric or not. The plaintiff, George W. Hedden (Collector of Customs), argued that it should be classified as such and thus subject to higher duties while defendant Augustus I. Iselin contended otherwise. The court ruled in favor of Hedden stating that although technically 'ladies' cloth' may not meet all criteria to qualify as worsted fabric according to textile experts, for customs purposes it is sufficient if it meets general commercial understanding and usage which considers this material a kind of worsted fabric.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The Hedden v. Iselin case did not have a dissenting opinion recorded in the official court documents. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the importers had to pay duties on their imported goods, as per the Tariff Act of 1883.

Opinion written by Justice SBlatchford
Decided: Jan 26, 1892
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms