Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue, v. Butterworth Et Al., Trustee

• 1933 • 290 U.S. 365 • Hughes Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case Helvering v. Butterworth et al., Trustee, in 1933 revolved around the issue of tax liability for a trust fund's income. The respondents were trustees of a fund created by an individual who retained the power to revoke or modify it at any time during his lifetime and also had the right to receive its net income annually until his death or earlier termination of the trust. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue argued that under Section 219(h) and (i) of the Revenue Act,...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Hughes Court
Term: 1933
Docket: 75
290 U.S. 365
54 S. Ct. 221
78 L. Ed. 365
1933 U.S. LEXIS 467
Argued: Nov 13, 1933

Helvering, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue, v. Butterworth Et Al., Trustee

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case Helvering v. Butterworth et al., Trustee, in 1933 revolved around the issue of tax liability for a trust fund's income. The respondents were trustees of a fund created by an individual who retained the power to revoke or modify it at any time during his lifetime and also had the right to receive its net income annually until his death or earlier termination of the trust. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue argued that under Section 219(h) and (i) of the Revenue Act, this made him liable for taxes on said income as if he was still in direct possession thereof - essentially treating it as part of his gross estate. However, upon reaching court, Justice Cardozo delivered an opinion stating that these sections did not apply since they only covered cases where transfers were intended to take effect after death; whereas here, transfer took place immediately upon creation with no stipulation about post-death effects. Thus, despite retaining certain powers over it including receiving annual net income from it till death/termination - which could be seen as indirect control - he wasn't considered owner anymore so couldn't be taxed like one. This ruling clarified how trusts are treated under tax law and set precedent regarding taxation based on ownership versus control.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Helvering v. Butterworth, Justice Cardozo disagreed with the majority's interpretation of tax law and its application to trusts. He argued that a trust should not be considered as an entity separate from its beneficiaries when it comes to taxation. According to him, income generated by a trust should be taxed directly in the hands of beneficiaries rather than at the level of the trust itself. This view was based on his understanding that Congress intended for taxes to apply where income is enjoyed and consumed, which in this case would be with individual beneficiaries rather than impersonal trusts. His argument essentially centered around fairness and economic realities over legal formalities or structures used primarily for tax avoidance purposes.

Opinion written by Justice JCMcReynolds
Decided: Dec 11, 1933
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms