Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hennington v. Georgia

• 1895 • 163 U.S. 299 • Fuller Court
In the case of Hennington v. Georgia in 1895, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving racial discrimination during jury selection. The plaintiff, an African American man named William Hennington, was convicted for murder by an all-white jury in Georgia state court and sentenced to death. He appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court arguing that he had been denied equal protection under the law because black citizens were systematically excluded from serving on juries in his...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1895
Docket: 150
163 U.S. 299
16 S. Ct. 1086
41 L. Ed. 166
1896 U.S. LEXIS 2267
Argued: Mar 17, 1896

Hennington v. Georgia

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hennington v. Georgia in 1895, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a dispute involving racial discrimination during jury selection. The plaintiff, an African American man named William Hennington, was convicted for murder by an all-white jury in Georgia state court and sentenced to death. He appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court arguing that he had been denied equal protection under the law because black citizens were systematically excluded from serving on juries in his county due to their race - a violation of Fourteenth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court rejected Hennington's appeal with a 7-2 decision stating that while it is unconstitutional for states to exclude individuals from jury service based solely on their race, there wasn't enough evidence presented proving systematic exclusion of blacks from juries in Dodge County where trial took place. Therefore, they upheld his conviction and sentence.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Hennington v. Georgia, Justice Harlan argued that the defendant's constitutional rights were violated due to a lack of proper legal representation during his trial. He believed that Hennington was not given adequate time or opportunity to secure counsel and prepare an effective defense against serious charges which could result in capital punishment. The justice also pointed out discrepancies in how different states interpreted the right to counsel, emphasizing the need for uniformity across jurisdictions. Furthermore, he criticized Georgia’s practice of allowing defendants only one day between indictment and trial as it undermined their ability to mount a fair defense. In conclusion, Justice Harlan maintained that these circumstances resulted in a violation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Opinion written by Justice JHarlan(1)
Decided: May 18, 1896
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms