In Herrera v. United States, the Supreme Court dealt with a case involving an individual named Herrera who was convicted of smuggling goods into the United States from Mexico. The defendant argued that his conviction should be overturned because he had not been given a fair trial due to bias on the part of one of the jurors in his case. However, after examining all available evidence and testimony, including that provided by other members of the jury panel, it was determined by majority opinion that there was no clear proof or indication that any prejudice existed which could have influenced or affected their decision-making process during deliberations. Therefore, despite Herrera's claims to contrary effect about juror bias potentially compromising his right to impartial adjudication under law as guaranteed by Sixth Amendment protections for criminal defendants in federal court proceedings - such allegations were ultimately dismissed as unfounded and without merit; thus upholding original verdict rendered against him at trial level below.

The Herrera v. United States case does not have a recorded dissenting opinion from 1911. It appears there may be some confusion with the details provided as this specific case is more commonly associated with a 1993 Supreme Court decision, which also doesn't contain any formal published dissenting opinions. Please provide additional information or clarify the request for an accurate summary of the desired content.