Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hezekiah Wood v. John Davis And Others

1812 • 11 U.S. 271 • Marshall Court
Hezekiah Wood v. John Davis and Others was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1812. The dispute centered around a contract between Hezekiah Wood, an Ohio resident, and John Davis and others from Virginia regarding the sale of land located in Kentucky. At issue was whether or not the contract had been breached when Davis failed to pay for his portion of the purchase price as agreed upon in their agreement. The court determined that there had indeed been a breach of contract on...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Marshall Court
Term: 1812
11 U.S. 271
3 L. Ed. 339
1812 U.S. LEXIS 392
Argued: Mar 09, 1812

Hezekiah Wood v. John Davis And Others

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Hezekiah Wood v. John Davis and Others was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1812. The dispute centered around a contract between Hezekiah Wood, an Ohio resident, and John Davis and others from Virginia regarding the sale of land located in Kentucky. At issue was whether or not the contract had been breached when Davis failed to pay for his portion of the purchase price as agreed upon in their agreement. The court determined that there had indeed been a breach of contract on behalf of Davis due to his failure to make payment according to terms set forth within it; therefore, they ruled that he must compensate Wood for any damages incurred as well as interest accrued since its inception. This ruling established precedent which has become foundational law today: if one party fails to fulfill contractual obligations then they are liable for any losses suffered by another party due to this breach regardless of where either resides geographically or legally speaking.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

Hezekiah Wood brought a case against John Davis and others, claiming that he was the rightful owner of certain lands in Kentucky. The majority opinion held that Hezekiah had failed to prove his ownership of the land, as required by law. However, Justice Story dissented from this ruling. He argued that although Hezekiah did not have a deed or other formal proof of title to the property at issue, he had presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate his right to it through long-term possession and use. Furthermore, Justice Story noted that even if there were some technical flaws in Hezekiah's claim under existing laws governing real estate transactions in Kentucky at the time, those laws should be interpreted liberally so as not to deprive him of what was clearly his just due.

Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms