Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Holyoke Company v. Lyman

• 1872 • 82 U.S. 500 • Chase Court
Holyoke Company v. Lyman was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a dispute between the Holyoke Company and Lyman, a former employee of the company. The Holyoke Company had sued Lyman for breach of contract, claiming that he had failed to fulfill his contractual obligations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Holyoke Company, finding that Lyman had indeed breached his contract. The Court held that Lyman had failed to perform his duties as outlined in...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1872
82 U.S. 500
21 L. Ed. 133
1872 U.S. LEXIS 1279
Argued: Jan 23, 1873

Holyoke Company v. Lyman

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Holyoke Company v. Lyman was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1872. The case involved a dispute between the Holyoke Company and Lyman, a former employee of the company. The Holyoke Company had sued Lyman for breach of contract, claiming that he had failed to fulfill his contractual obligations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Holyoke Company, finding that Lyman had indeed breached his contract. The Court held that Lyman had failed to perform his duties as outlined in the contract, and that the Holyoke Company was entitled to damages for the breach. The Court also held that the Holyoke Company was entitled to an injunction against Lyman, preventing him from engaging in any further breaches of the contract. The Court's decision in Holyoke Company v. Lyman established the principle that a breach of contract can result in both damages and an injunction against the breaching party. This case is still cited today as an example of the legal remedies available to parties who have been wronged by a breach of contract.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Holyoke Company v. Lyman, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a contract between two parties could be enforced when it had been made in violation of a state statute. The majority opinion held that such contracts were not enforceable and thus ruled against Lyman's claim for damages from Holyoke Company. However, Justice Field dissented from this ruling on the grounds that there was no evidence to suggest that either party knew or should have known about the relevant state law at issue when they entered into their agreement. He argued further that if one party had knowledge of an applicable law while entering into a contract then it would be reasonable to expect them to inform their counterpart before signing any agreements; however, since neither side here seemed aware of any potential legal issues surrounding their transaction, he concluded that enforcing this particular contract would not violate public policy and should therefore stand as valid under common law principles.

Opinion written by Justice NClifford
Decided: Feb 10, 1873
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms