Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Company

• 1893 • 150 U.S. 610 • Fuller Court
In the 1893 U.S. Supreme Court case of Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Company, the court examined whether a state could impose taxes on personal property owned by non-residents but located within its jurisdiction. The plaintiff, Mr. Horn, was a resident of New York who owned two steamships that were docked and operated in Michigan waters for more than six months each year. The defendant, Detroit Dry Dock Company (representing the State), levied taxes on these ships as they were considered to be...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1893
Docket: 129
150 U.S. 610
14 S. Ct. 214
37 L. Ed. 1199
1893 U.S. LEXIS 2410
Argued: Dec 05, 1893

Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Company

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1893 U.S. Supreme Court case of Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Company, the court examined whether a state could impose taxes on personal property owned by non-residents but located within its jurisdiction. The plaintiff, Mr. Horn, was a resident of New York who owned two steamships that were docked and operated in Michigan waters for more than six months each year. The defendant, Detroit Dry Dock Company (representing the State), levied taxes on these ships as they were considered to be situated in Michigan despite their owner's out-of-state residency. Mr. Horn argued this taxation violated his constitutional rights under both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses since he was not a resident of Michigan; however, the Supreme Court disagreed with him. The court ruled that states have authority to tax personal property within their borders regardless of where owners reside if such properties are used or employed continuously within said state for over half a year annually - even if those properties may occasionally leave and return during that period. This ruling affirmed states' power to levy taxes on non-resident-owned assets operating extensively within their jurisdictions while also clarifying how "domicile" is determined for taxation purposes.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Horn v. Detroit Dry Dock Company, it was argued that the majority's decision to uphold Michigan's law regarding liens on ships contradicted previous rulings by the Supreme Court. The dissenting justices believed that federal maritime law should supersede state laws in this case, as they felt it was a matter of national concern rather than a local one. They contended that allowing individual states to regulate such matters could lead to inconsistencies and confusion within the shipping industry, which operates across state lines and international borders. Furthermore, they expressed concerns about potential violations of due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment if ship owners were subjected to differing legal standards depending on where their vessels happened to be located at any given time.

Opinion written by Justice HEJackson
Decided: Dec 18, 1893
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms