Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hotel Company v. Wade

• 1877 • 97 U.S. 13 • Waite Court
In the case of Hotel Company v. Wade, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a hotel company could be held liable for the death of a guest. The guest, Wade, had died after falling from a window in the hotel. The hotel company argued that they were not liable for Wade's death because they had not been negligent in any way. The Supreme Court held that the hotel company was liable for Wade's death. The Court reasoned that the hotel company had a duty to provide a safe...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1877
Docket: 188
97 U.S. 13
24 L. Ed. 917
1877 U.S. LEXIS 1750
Argued: Jan 29, 1878

Hotel Company v. Wade

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hotel Company v. Wade, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether a hotel company could be held liable for the death of a guest. The guest, Wade, had died after falling from a window in the hotel. The hotel company argued that they were not liable for Wade's death because they had not been negligent in any way. The Supreme Court held that the hotel company was liable for Wade's death. The Court reasoned that the hotel company had a duty to provide a safe environment for its guests, and that this duty extended to the windows in the hotel. The Court found that the hotel company had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the windows were safe, and thus had breached its duty of care. As a result, the Court held that the hotel company was liable for Wade's death.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hotel Company v. Wade, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a hotel company could be held liable for damages caused by an employee's negligence. The majority opinion found that the hotel company was not responsible for any damage caused by its employees' negligence and thus dismissed the plaintiff's claim. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that employers should be held accountable when their employees cause harm to another person or property due to their negligent actions while in service of said employer. He reasoned that it would only be fair if employers were made liable since they are ultimately responsible for hiring competent individuals who can properly perform their duties without causing harm to others; furthermore, he believed such liability would encourage employers to exercise greater care in selecting suitable personnel as well as providing proper training and supervision so as to avoid similar incidents occurring again in future.

Opinion written by Justice NClifford
Decided: Feb 11, 1878
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms