Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

• 1941 • 315 U.S. 437 • Stone Court
In the 1941 case of Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when WERB ordered a local union to cease and desist from picketing a hotel after it refused to bargain with them because they were not certified as an exclusive bargaining representative under state law. The union argued that this order violated...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Stone Court
Term: 1941
Docket: 124
315 U.S. 437
62 S. Ct. 706
86 L. Ed. 946
1942 U.S. LEXIS 1155
Argued: Jan 09, 1942

Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122, Et Al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the 1941 case of Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al., the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board (WERB). The dispute arose when WERB ordered a local union to cease and desist from picketing a hotel after it refused to bargain with them because they were not certified as an exclusive bargaining representative under state law. The union argued that this order violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly but the court disagreed stating that states have broad power in regulating labor disputes including limiting or prohibiting certain types of picketing activities if deemed necessary for maintaining industrial peace.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

The dissenting opinion in the case of Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance, Local No. 122 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board argued that the majority's decision was an overreach and a violation of states' rights to regulate their own labor relations. The dissenters believed that the National Labor Relations Act did not preempt state law in this area, as it only provided a minimum standard for labor relations and allowed states to provide additional protections if they chose to do so. They also disagreed with the majority's interpretation of "labor dispute", arguing that it should be broadly interpreted to include any controversy concerning terms or conditions of employment, rather than being limited to disputes between employees and employers. Finally, they expressed concern about potential negative impacts on collective bargaining due to interference from state agencies like the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board.

Opinion written by Justice FFrankfurter
Decided: Mar 02, 1942
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms