Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Howell v. Howell

• 2016 • 137 S. Ct. 1400 • Roberts Court
In the case of Howell v. Howell (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a state court may not order a veteran to indemnify a divorced spouse for the loss in the divorced spouse’s portion of the veteran's retirement pay caused by the veteran's waiver of retirement pay to receive service-related disability benefits. The dispute arose when John Howell, an Air Force veteran, elected to waive $250 per month from his military pension in favor of receiving an equal amount as tax-free disability...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Roberts Court
Term: 2016
Docket: 15-1031
137 S. Ct. 1400
197 L. Ed. 2d 781
2017 U.S. LEXIS 2946
Argued: Mar 20, 2017

Howell v. Howell

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Questions presented:
SCOTUS Records

15-1031 HOWELL V. HOWELL DECISION BELOW: 361 P3d 936 CERT. GRANTED 12/2/2016 QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act preempts a state court's order directing a veteran to indemnify a former spouse for a reduction in the former spouse's portion of the veteran's military retirement pay, where that reduction results from the veteran's post-divorce waiver of retirement pay in order to receive compensation for a service-connected disability. LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: CV-15-0030-PR

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Howell v. Howell (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a state court may not order a veteran to indemnify a divorced spouse for the loss in the divorced spouse’s portion of the veteran's retirement pay caused by the veteran's waiver of retirement pay to receive service-related disability benefits. The dispute arose when John Howell, an Air Force veteran, elected to waive $250 per month from his military pension in favor of receiving an equal amount as tax-free disability compensation instead. His ex-wife Sandra argued that this decision reduced her share under their divorce agreement and sued him for reimbursement in Arizona courts which sided with her initially before being overturned by higher courts leading up to this ruling by SCOTUS.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Howell v. Howell, there was no dissenting opinion recorded as the decision was unanimous. The Supreme Court ruled 8-0 in favor of John Howell, a veteran whose ex-wife Sandra sought to secure her portion of his military retirement pay after he waived part of it for disability benefits post-divorce. The court held that federal law preempts state law and therefore prevents an ex-spouse from increasing their share of a veteran's retirement pay when the veteran waives retirement pay in order to receive service-related disability benefits.

Opinion written by Justice SGBreyer
Decided: May 15, 2017
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms