Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Hughes, Administrator, v. Fetter Et Al.

• 1950 • 341 U.S. 609 • Vinson Court
In the case of Hughes v. Fetter (1950), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Wisconsin statute which barred out-of-state wrongful death claims was unconstitutional, violating the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution. The plaintiff, an Illinois resident, had filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin for his son's death caused by negligence in Illinois. However, under Wisconsin law at that time, only deaths caused within its borders could be litigated there. The court held that this restriction...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Vinson Court
Term: 1950
Docket: 355
341 U.S. 609
71 S. Ct. 980
95 L. Ed. 2d 1212
1951 U.S. LEXIS 1728
Argued: Mar 01, 1951

Hughes, Administrator, v. Fetter Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Hughes v. Fetter (1950), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Wisconsin statute which barred out-of-state wrongful death claims was unconstitutional, violating the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution. The plaintiff, an Illinois resident, had filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin for his son's death caused by negligence in Illinois. However, under Wisconsin law at that time, only deaths caused within its borders could be litigated there. The court held that this restriction unconstitutionally interfered with interstate judicial administration because it failed to respect judgments and public acts from other states as required by Article IV Section 1 of the Constitution - also known as "Full Faith and Credit Clause". This clause requires each state to recognize and respect legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions made in other states within United States.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for Hughes v. Fetter, Justice Frankfurter argued that Wisconsin had a legitimate interest in applying its own law to wrongful death cases involving its residents, even if the fatal accident occurred out of state. He contended that it was not an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce for a state to apply its own laws and procedures within its jurisdiction. The majority's decision, he believed, undermined states' rights by forcing them to recognize claims under foreign tort law when they might have valid reasons not to do so - such as differences in legal standards or potential difficulties with evidence collection from another jurisdiction. Furthermore, he expressed concern about the implications of this ruling on other areas where states traditionally exercised their sovereign powers like probate and divorce proceedings.

Opinion written by Justice HLBlack
Decided: Jun 04, 1951
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms