Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Of North Carolina, Et Al. v. Martin Cromartie Et Al.

• 1998 • 526 U.S. 541 • Rehnquist Court
The U.S. Supreme Court case of James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie et al., 1998 dealt with the issue of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina's 12th Congressional District. The plaintiffs argued that the state had unconstitutionally used race as a predominant factor when redrawing district lines following the 1990 census, violating their Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection under law by segregating voters based on race without compelling...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Rehnquist Court
Term: 1998
Docket: 98-85
526 U.S. 541
119 S. Ct. 1545
143 L. Ed. 2d 731
1999 U.S. LEXIS 3171
Argued: Jan 20, 1999

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Of North Carolina, Et Al. v. Martin Cromartie Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court case of James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie et al., 1998 dealt with the issue of racial gerrymandering in North Carolina's 12th Congressional District. The plaintiffs argued that the state had unconstitutionally used race as a predominant factor when redrawing district lines following the 1990 census, violating their Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection under law by segregating voters based on race without compelling interest or narrowly tailored means to achieve it. However, the defendants contended that political affiliation and not race was primarily considered during redistricting since African Americans overwhelmingly vote for Democrats in this area; thus making them an important demographic for creating a competitive Democratic district. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendants (5-4), stating there wasn't sufficient evidence proving that racial considerations predominated over legitimate legislative objectives such as maintaining partisan balance or keeping communities intact while drawing boundaries.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor of North Carolina, et al. v. Martin Cromartie et al., Justice Stevens argued that the majority's decision to remand the case back to District Court was unnecessary and a waste of judicial resources. He believed that there was already sufficient evidence on record demonstrating that race had been used as a predominant factor in redrawing district lines, which is unconstitutional under previous Supreme Court rulings such as Shaw v Reno (1993). The fact that legislators were trying to create a safe seat for African American voters did not justify this racial gerrymandering because it still involved making decisions based primarily on race rather than traditional districting principles like compactness or respect for political subdivisions. Therefore, he felt it would have been more appropriate for the court to affirm the lower court's ruling against North Carolina instead of sending it back down for further proceedings.

Opinion written by Justice CThomas
Decided: May 17, 1999
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcript
Argued: Oct 05, 2026
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms