Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

In Re Streep, Petitioner

• 1894 • 156 U.S. 207 • Fuller Court
The In re Streep case in 1894 involved a petitioner, Streep, who was seeking relief from the U.S. Supreme Court after being denied citizenship by lower courts due to his inability to fulfill certain residency requirements stipulated under immigration laws at that time. The central issue revolved around whether or not he had maintained continuous residence within the United States for five years prior to his application for naturalization - a requirement of the Naturalization Act of 1802....Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Fuller Court
Term: 1894
156 U.S. 207
15 S. Ct. 358
39 L. Ed. 399
1895 U.S. LEXIS 2125

In Re Streep, Petitioner

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

The In re Streep case in 1894 involved a petitioner, Streep, who was seeking relief from the U.S. Supreme Court after being denied citizenship by lower courts due to his inability to fulfill certain residency requirements stipulated under immigration laws at that time. The central issue revolved around whether or not he had maintained continuous residence within the United States for five years prior to his application for naturalization - a requirement of the Naturalization Act of 1802. Despite having lived in America for over five years, there were periods when Streep traveled abroad and it was argued this broke his period of 'continuous' residence. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Streep stating that temporary absences did not interrupt continuity of residence required by law and thus granted him citizenship.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

I'm sorry, but I was unable to find any information on a U.S. Supreme Court case titled "In re STREEP, PETITIONER" from 1894 or any other year. It's possible that there might be some confusion about the name of the case or its date. If you have more details like the full title of the case, names of parties involved, or specific legal issues it addressed, I would be happy to help further with your request!

Opinion written by Justice MWFuller
Decided: Jan 28, 1895
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms