Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Incres Steamship Co., Ltd., v. International Maritime Workers Union Et Al.

• 1962 • 372 U.S. 24 • Warren Court
In the case of Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union et al., 1962, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Incres Steamship Company, stating that labor disputes involving foreign-flag ships with predominantly foreign crews were not within the jurisdiction of American courts unless there was a clear and substantial impact on American commerce. The dispute began when an Italian ship owned by Incres was picketed by an American union demanding better wages and working...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Warren Court
Term: 1962
Docket: 33
372 U.S. 24
83 S. Ct. 611
9 L. Ed. 2d 557
1963 U.S. LEXIS 2396
Argued: Dec 12, 1962

Incres Steamship Co., Ltd., v. International Maritime Workers Union Et Al.

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In the case of Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union et al., 1962, the U.S Supreme Court ruled in favor of Incres Steamship Company, stating that labor disputes involving foreign-flag ships with predominantly foreign crews were not within the jurisdiction of American courts unless there was a clear and substantial impact on American commerce. The dispute began when an Italian ship owned by Incres was picketed by an American union demanding better wages and working conditions for its crew members who were mostly Italian citizens. The court held that applying U.S labor laws to such situations would interfere with international maritime operations and could potentially violate principles of international law.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In the dissenting opinion for the case of Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union et al., Justice Douglas argued that American labor laws should apply to foreign-flag ships when they are in U.S waters, especially if those ships have a significant connection with the United States. He believed that it was not enough to simply consider where a ship is registered or flagged; instead, one must also take into account factors such as ownership and control of operations. In this particular case, he pointed out that although the vessel flew under a Liberian flag, it was owned by an American corporation and operated primarily between New York and Nassau – thus having substantial links with America. Therefore, according to him, U.S labor laws should be applicable on board this ship while in U.S waters so as to protect maritime workers' rights effectively.

Opinion written by Justice TCClark
Decided: Feb 18, 1963
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms