Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Insurance Company v. Wilkinso

• 1871 • 80 U.S. 222 • Chase Court
Insurance Company v. Wilkinson was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between an insurance company and a policyholder over the validity of a policy. The insurance company had issued a policy to the policyholder, but the policyholder had failed to pay the premiums. The insurance company then sought to have the policy declared void. The Supreme Court held that the policy was valid and enforceable. The Court reasoned that the policyholder had not...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1871
80 U.S. 222
20 L. Ed. 617
1871 U.S. LEXIS 1331

Insurance Company v. Wilkinso

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Insurance Company v. Wilkinson was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1871. The case involved a dispute between an insurance company and a policyholder over the validity of a policy. The insurance company had issued a policy to the policyholder, but the policyholder had failed to pay the premiums. The insurance company then sought to have the policy declared void. The Supreme Court held that the policy was valid and enforceable. The Court reasoned that the policyholder had not acted in bad faith by failing to pay the premiums, and that the insurance company had not taken any action to void the policy. The Court also held that the policyholder had a reasonable expectation of coverage, and that the insurance company had not acted in bad faith by failing to provide coverage. The Court's decision in Insurance Company v. Wilkinson established that insurance companies must act in good faith when dealing with policyholders, and that policyholders have a reasonable expectation of coverage. The decision also established that insurance companies cannot unilaterally void policies without taking action to do so.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Insurance Company v. Wilkinson, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether an insurance company could be held liable for a fire that had been caused by one of its employees. The majority opinion found in favor of the insurance company and held that it was not responsible for any damages resulting from the employee's negligence. However, Justice Field dissented from this decision and argued that the insurance company should have been held liable because it had hired someone who they knew or should have known posed a risk to their property due to his past history with fires. He further argued that since there were no contractual provisions limiting liability in such cases, then common law principles would apply which made them responsible for any damage caused by their employee’s negligence.

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Mar 25, 1872
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms