Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Insurance Company v. Weide

• 1869 • 76 U.S. 677 • Chase Court
Insurance Company v. Weide was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The case involved a dispute between an insurance company and a policyholder over the validity of a life insurance policy. The policyholder, Weide, had purchased a life insurance policy from the insurance company, but the company refused to pay out the policy when Weide died. The insurance company argued that the policy was invalid because Weide had failed to disclose a pre-existing medical condition at the...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Chase Court
Term: 1869
76 U.S. 677
19 L. Ed. 810
1869 U.S. LEXIS 1019
Argued: Apr 21, 1870

Insurance Company v. Weide

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

Insurance Company v. Weide was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1869. The case involved a dispute between an insurance company and a policyholder over the validity of a life insurance policy. The policyholder, Weide, had purchased a life insurance policy from the insurance company, but the company refused to pay out the policy when Weide died. The insurance company argued that the policy was invalid because Weide had failed to disclose a pre-existing medical condition at the time of purchase. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Weide, finding that the insurance company had failed to prove that Weide had deliberately withheld information about his medical condition. The Court held that the insurance company had a duty to investigate the facts of the case and that it had failed to do so. The Court also held that the insurance company had failed to prove that Weide had acted in bad faith in not disclosing his medical condition. As a result, the Court ruled that the insurance company was liable to pay out the policy.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Insurance Company v. Weide, the Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether a policy of insurance issued by an insurance company to a shipowner covered losses resulting from the capture of his vessel during war. The majority opinion held that such coverage did not exist under the terms of the policy and thus denied recovery for damages caused by war-related events. However, in dissent Justice Field argued that while it is true that most policies do not cover losses due to war or other similar occurrences, this particular policy contained no express exclusion for these types of risks and therefore should be interpreted as providing coverage against them. He further noted that if insurers wish to exclude certain risks they must make those exclusions clear in their policies so as to avoid any ambiguity or confusion on behalf of their customers regarding what is and isn't covered under their contracts.

Opinion written by Justice SNelson
Decided: Apr 30, 1870
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms