Display Mode
Dark
Dark
Light
Light
Theme Cover
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Search History
No search history
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Media
Term
Opinion Writer
Direction
Field

Insurance Companies v. Thompson

• 1877 • 95 U.S. 547 • Waite Court
In Insurance Companies v. Thompson, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether an insurance company could be held liable for a policyholder’s death due to a breach of contract. The case involved a policyholder, Thompson, who had taken out a life insurance policy with the defendant insurance companies. Thompson died shortly after taking out the policy, and his widow sued the insurance companies for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the insurance companies...Open Case
Score:
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms
1 results found
Become a Sponsor
Support Us
Feedback: We can do better!

Your feedback is extremely important to us and greatly appreciated.
Tell us what went wrong

Copied to clipboard
StarredCase saved
Oh No!
Chief Waite Court
Term: 1877
Docket: 104
95 U.S. 547
24 L. Ed. 487
1877 U.S. LEXIS 2202
Argued: Nov 21, 1877

Insurance Companies v. Thompson

  • Pro
  • Pro
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.

Opinion Summary
AI Abstract

In Insurance Companies v. Thompson, the Supreme Court of the United States was asked to decide whether an insurance company could be held liable for a policyholder’s death due to a breach of contract. The case involved a policyholder, Thompson, who had taken out a life insurance policy with the defendant insurance companies. Thompson died shortly after taking out the policy, and his widow sued the insurance companies for breach of contract. The Supreme Court held that the insurance companies were liable for Thompson’s death. The Court reasoned that the insurance companies had a duty to provide coverage for Thompson’s death, and that they had breached that duty by failing to do so. The Court also held that the widow was entitled to damages for the breach of contract. In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that the insurance companies were liable for Thompson’s death due to a breach of contract. The Court held that the widow was entitled to damages for the breach of contract, and that the insurance companies had a duty to provide coverage for Thompson’s death.

Dissent Summary
AI Abstract

In Insurance Companies v. Thompson, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether a state court had jurisdiction over an insurance company that did business in multiple states but was incorporated in another state. The majority opinion held that the state court lacked jurisdiction and thus could not hear the case. Justice Field dissented from this decision, arguing that it would be unfair for an insurance company to escape liability simply because it happened to be incorporated in one particular state rather than another. He argued further that if such companies were allowed to do so, they would have no incentive whatsoever to comply with laws of other states where they conducted business since there would be no consequence for their actions or lack thereof. Ultimately, he concluded by stating his belief that Congress should pass legislation granting all courts within a certain district concurrent jurisdiction over any corporation doing business therein regardless of its place of incorporation

Opinion written by Justice SFMiller
Decided: Dec 03, 1877
PDF viewer is not available.
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
AI Assist
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
PDF viewer is not available.
Oral Transcripts
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Related Cases
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Ask Etalia.ai
Go Pro!orto acess these features and extra content.
Audio of Oral Arguments
Free Trial!
Become a Sponsor

Support Us
Copyright © 2026Etalia.ai All Rights Reserved
  • Blog
  • •
  • Privacy
  • •
  • Terms